<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordZe API Python Script</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codingwithcody.com/2009/07/wordze-api-python-script/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codingwithcody.com/2009/07/wordze-api-python-script/</link>
	<description>write compile run repeat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody</title>
		<link>http://www.codingwithcody.com/2009/07/wordze-api-python-script/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingwithcody.com/?p=34#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Cole. I really appreciate the kind words.

As of late, I&#039;ve fallen back to the AdWords suggest tool. The real issue I&#039;ve found with AdWords in the past is the lack of absolute traffic numbers, but the benefit of having a complete picture is priceless for niche terms. When making a term selection, it seems having a complete but relative count for all terms is better than having gaps in the data.

Of all the services of this nature I&#039;ve encountered in the past, WordZe seems the most useful. I have to admit it&#039;s been some time since I&#039;ve explored them (and may be a viable solution to a bigger problem with automation I&#039;ve been dealing with lately). Have you had much luck with it? What other services have you tried?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Cole. I really appreciate the kind words.</p>
<p>As of late, I&#8217;ve fallen back to the AdWords suggest tool. The real issue I&#8217;ve found with AdWords in the past is the lack of absolute traffic numbers, but the benefit of having a complete picture is priceless for niche terms. When making a term selection, it seems having a complete but relative count for all terms is better than having gaps in the data.</p>
<p>Of all the services of this nature I&#8217;ve encountered in the past, WordZe seems the most useful. I have to admit it&#8217;s been some time since I&#8217;ve explored them (and may be a viable solution to a bigger problem with automation I&#8217;ve been dealing with lately). Have you had much luck with it? What other services have you tried?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.codingwithcody.com/2009/07/wordze-api-python-script/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingwithcody.com/?p=34#comment-289</guid>
		<description>This is really useful, thanks Cody - Reading through other posts I see you encounter alot of the same issues as me!

As an aside, how are you getting on with Wordze? I&#039;ve been checking out a few services and this seems the best for API work. Is it good value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really useful, thanks Cody &#8211; Reading through other posts I see you encounter alot of the same issues as me!</p>
<p>As an aside, how are you getting on with Wordze? I&#8217;ve been checking out a few services and this seems the best for API work. Is it good value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
